houstonlogo rjilogo

The Right-to-Know Network

Back to search

Delapasse No. 1 Production Facility

Parent Companies:
Crosstex Treating Services LP
EPA Facility ID:
100000195585
Other ID:
Facility DUNS:
0
Parent Company DUNS:
0

Location:

Address:
2 miles SE of Lakeland, LA
Lakeland, LA 70752
County:
POINTE COUPEE
Lat / Long:
30.570, -91.384 (Get map)
Method:
GPS Code Measurements (Psuedo Range) Standard Positioning Service SA ON
Description:
Storage Tank
Horizonal accuracy:
10 m
Horizontal reference datum:
North American Datum of 1983
Source map scale:

Owner/Operator:

Name:
Crosstex Energy Services LP
Phone:
(214) 721-9282
Address:
2501 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 100
Dallas, TX 75201
Foreign Address:

Person responsible for RMP implementation:

Name:
Amy Petrof
Title:
Environmental Compliance Specialist

Emergency contact:

Name:
Rick Glasser
Title:
Field Superintendent
Phone:
(225) 939-7066
24-hour phone:
(225) 939-7066
Ext or PIN:
Email:
N/A

Other contacts:

Facility (or company) email:
Facility phone:
Facility (or company) URL:

Safety:

Local Emergency Planning Committee:
Pointe Coupee Parish
Full-Time Equivalent Employees:
0
Covered by OSHA PSM:
No
EPCRA section 302:
No
CAA Title Air Operating Permit:
No
CAA Permit ID#:
OSHA Star/Merit Ranking
No
Last Safety Inspection Date:
Inspecting Agency:
Never had one
Using Predictive Filing:
No

Processes:

NGL production
RMP ID:
66454
CBI claimed:
No
Program Level:
2
NAICS:
Natural Gas Liquid Extraction (211112)
Chemical name
CAS#
Quantity (lbs.)
CBI
Butane
106-97-8
156,000
No
Ethane
74-84-0
144,000
No
Public OCA Chemical
0
No
Public OCA Chemical
0
No

RMP Preparer:

Name:
HLP Engineering Inc.
Address:
117 Park Center Street
Broussard, LA 70518
Foreign Address:

Phone:
(337) 839-1075

Latest RMP Submission:

Date:
June 20, 2006
Type:
First-time submission
Reason:
Registered:
No
RMP ID:
45930

Deregistration:

Date:
Effective Date:
Reason:
Other
Other Reason:
RMP determination of non-applicability

2. Toxics: Worst-case

None

3. Toxics: Alternative release

None

4. Flammables: Worst-case

Some Risk Management Plan information is not provided in the available RMP data. You need to make an appointment at an EPA Reading Room In order to get access to details from the Off-Site Consequence Analysis (OCA) such as:

Instructions on how to make an EPA appointment can be found here.

Public OCA Chemical (in NGL production)
CBI claimed:
No
Model used:
EPA's RMP*Comp(TM)
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Blast walls

5. Flammables: Alternative release

Some Risk Management Plan information is not provided in the available RMP data. You need to make an appointment at an EPA Reading Room In order to get access to details from the Off-Site Consequence Analysis (OCA) such as:

Instructions on how to make an EPA appointment can be found here.

Public OCA Chemical (in NGL production)
CBI claimed:
No
Model used:
EPA's RMP*Comp(TM)
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Fire wall
  • Blast walls
  • Enclosures
Active mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Sprinkler systems
  • Deluge systems
  • Water curtain
  • Excess flow valve
Public OCA Chemical (in NGL production)
CBI claimed:
No
Model used:
EPA's RMP*Comp(TM)
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Fire wall
  • Blast walls
  • Enclosures
Active mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Sprinkler systems
  • Deluge systems
  • Water curtain
  • Excess flow valve

6. Five-year accident history

No Registered Accidents

7. Prevention: Program level 3

No Prevention Program level 3

8. Prevention Program level 2

NGL production, Natural Gas Liquid Extraction (211112)
Prevention Program ID:
24519
Safety Review Date
May 16, 2006, since latest RMP submission
PHA Update Date
, since latest RMP submission
Safety Regulations
  • ASTM Standards
Hazards Identified
  • Fire
  • Explosion
  • Overpressurization
  • Equipment failure
  • Tornado
Process Controls
  • Relief Valves
  • Manual Shutoffs
Mitigation Systems
  • None
Monitoring Systems
  • None
Changes since PHA
  • None
Training Type
  • On the Job
Competency Testing
  • Observation
Procedure Review Date
May 16, 2006, since latest RMP submission
Training Review Date
May 16, 2006, since latest RMP submission
Maintenance Review Date
May 16, 2006, since latest RMP submission
Maintenance Inspection Date
May 16, 2006, since latest RMP submission
Equipment Tested
Yes
Management of Change Most Recent Date
Management of Change Review Date
Pre-startup Review Date
Compliance Audit Date
None
Compliance Audit Change Completion Date
None
Incident Investigation Date
None
Incident Invest. Change Completion Date
None
Participation Plan Review Date
Hot Work Review Date
Contractor Safety Review Date
, since latest RMP submission
Contractor Safety Eval. Date
, since latest RMP submission

9. Emergency response

Facility In Community Plan:
Yes
Facility Own Response Plan:
No
Specific Facility Response Plan:
Yes
Inform. Procedures in Response Plan:
No
Emergency Care in Response Plan:
Yes
Plan Review Date:
Response Training Date:
May 16, 2006
Local Response Agency:
Local Response Agency Phone:
(225) 638-5540
Subject To - OSHA EAP:
No
Subject To - OSHA HAZWOPER:
No
Subject To - CWA:
No
Subject To - RCRA:
No
Subject To - OPA:
No
Subject To - State EPCRA:
No
Subject To - Other:

Executive Summary

This facility is aware of the requirements in the areas of Safety, Hazard Reviews, written Operating Procedures, Training, Maintenance, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations. To assist with ongoing compliance, a "Chemical Accident Prevention Compliance Manual" has been prepared and implemented. Concerning the emergency response policy at the facility, the owner has made the decision that employees will not respond to accidental releases of regulated substances and will instead evacuate. This facility processes natural gas liquids (NGL). Gas wells are routed through high pressure separators and a gas plant is used to strip out NGL product which is stored in a 30,000 gallon pressurized bullet tank operating at approximately 150 psig. The NGL is removed from the facility by transfers to tank trucks. The stationary source covered by this plan is only that equipment downstream of the gas plant and including the gas plant. The facility is subject to the RMP requirements since it is a natural gas processing plant producing NGL and contains threshold quantities of regulated substances. The NGL is a mixture of hydrocarbons consisting of methane, ethane, butane, isobutane, and propane. For purposes of determining the largest weight on site, the highest density substance was used (butane for NGL) which yielded a total weight of 156,000 pounds. Since this facility is a Program 2, a documented prevention program is required. This program is discussed in a "Chemical Accident Prevention Compliance Manual" prepared for the facility. The facility has not experienced a release as defined in the regulation within the past five years. Since this facility is a Program 2, a written emergency response program is required. This program is contained in Section 5.0 of the "Chemical Accident Prevention Compliance Manual" prepared for the facility. Further, emergency response procedures have been developed and are contained with the RMP and these procedures will be impl
emented in the event of an accidental release or the threat of such a release. Basically, the instructions are to evacuate the facility and then notify the proper authorities. At present time, there are no planned changes to improve safety.