houstonlogo rjilogo

The Right-to-Know Network

Back to search

Veolia Burnside Plant

Parent Companies:
Veolia North America Regeneration Services, L.L.C
EPA Facility ID:
100000140901
Other ID:
LAD980622112
Facility DUNS:
0
Parent Company DUNS:
80312289

Location:

Address:
3460 HIGHWAY 44
DARROW, LA 70725
County:
ASCENSION
Lat / Long:
30.124, -90.913 (Get map)
Method:
GPS - Unspecified
Description:
Plant Entrance (General)
Horizonal accuracy:
5.3 m
Horizontal reference datum:
World Geodetic System of 1984
Source map scale:

Owner/Operator:

Name:
Chemours Burnside Plant
Phone:
(225) 473-8618
Address:
3460 HIGHWAY 44
DARROW, LA 70725
Foreign Address:

Person responsible for RMP implementation:

Name:
Joseph A. Debiaso
Title:
PLANT MANAGER

Emergency contact:

Name:
TJ Ozbun
Title:
ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
Phone:
(225) 473-5607
24-hour phone:
(225) 264-3686
Ext or PIN:

Other contacts:

Facility (or company) email:
Facility phone:
Facility (or company) URL:

Safety:

Local Emergency Planning Committee:
Ascension Parish LEPC
Full-Time Equivalent Employees:
28
Covered by OSHA PSM:
Yes
EPCRA section 302:
Yes
CAA Title Air Operating Permit:
Yes
CAA Permit ID#:
0180-00007-V5
OSHA Star/Merit Ranking
No
Last Safety Inspection Date:
May 15, 2014
Inspecting Agency:
OSHA
Using Predictive Filing:
No

Processes:

Sulfuric Acid
RMP ID:
1000052590
CBI claimed:
No
Program Level:
3
NAICS:
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing (32518)
Chemical name
CAS#
Quantity (lbs.)
CBI
Sulfur trioxide
7446-11-9
885,000
No
Oleum (Fuming Sulfuric acid) [Sulfuric acid, mixture with sulfur trioxide]
8014-95-7
5,152,000
No
Public OCA Chemical
0
No
Public OCA Chemical
0
No
Railcar w/o ship papers
RMP ID:
1000052591
CBI claimed:
No
Program Level:
3
NAICS:
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing (32518)
Chemical name
CAS#
Quantity (lbs.)
CBI
Sulfur trioxide
7446-11-9
180,000
No
Public OCA Chemical
0
No

RMP Preparer:

Name:
Address:

,
Foreign Address:

Phone:

Latest RMP Submission:

Date:
June 16, 2014
Type:
Resubmission
Reason:
5-year update (40 CFR 68.190(b)(1))
Registered:
Yes
RMP ID:
1000042654

Deregistration:

Date:
Effective Date:
Reason:
Other Reason:

2. Toxics: Worst-case

Some Risk Management Plan information is not provided in the available RMP data. You need to make an appointment at an EPA Reading Room In order to get access to details from the Off-Site Consequence Analysis (OCA) such as:

Instructions on how to make an EPA appointment can be found here.

Public OCA Chemical (in Sulfuric Acid)
CBI claimed:
No
Percent weight:
Physical state:
Liquid
Model used:
EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
Release duration (mins):
60.00
Wind speed (meters per sec):
1.5
Stability class:
F
Topography:
Urban
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Enclosures
  • Berms
  • Drains
  • Sumps
Public OCA Chemical (in Railcar w/o ship papers)
CBI claimed:
No
Percent weight:
Physical state:
Liquid
Model used:
EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
Release duration (mins):
60.00
Wind speed (meters per sec):
1.5
Stability class:
F
Topography:
Urban
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Enclosures
  • Berms
  • Drains
  • Sumps

3. Toxics: Alternative release

Some Risk Management Plan information is not provided in the available RMP data. You need to make an appointment at an EPA Reading Room In order to get access to details from the Off-Site Consequence Analysis (OCA) such as:

Instructions on how to make an EPA appointment can be found here.

Public OCA Chemical (in Sulfuric Acid)
CBI claimed:
No
Percent weight:
Physical state:
Liquid
Model used:
EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
Wind speed (meters per sec):
3.00
Stability class:
D
Topography:
Urban
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Enclosures
  • Berms
  • Drains
  • Sumps
Active mitigation
considered:
  • Neutralization
  • Emergency shutdown
not considered:
  • Sprinkler systems
  • Deluge systems
  • Water curtain
  • Excess flow valve
  • Flares
  • Scrubbers
Public OCA Chemical (in Sulfuric Acid)
CBI claimed:
No
Percent weight:
Physical state:
Liquid
Model used:
EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
Wind speed (meters per sec):
3.00
Stability class:
D
Topography:
Urban
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Enclosures
  • Berms
  • Drains
  • Sumps
Active mitigation
considered:
  • Neutralization
  • Emergency shutdown
not considered:
  • Sprinkler systems
  • Deluge systems
  • Water curtain
  • Excess flow valve
  • Flares
  • Scrubbers
Public OCA Chemical (in Railcar w/o ship papers)
CBI claimed:
No
Percent weight:
Physical state:
Liquid
Model used:
EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
Wind speed (meters per sec):
3.00
Stability class:
D
Topography:
Urban
Passive mitigation
considered:
  • None
not considered:
  • Dikes
  • Enclosures
  • Berms
  • Drains
  • Sumps
Active mitigation
considered:
not considered:
  • Sprinkler systems
  • Deluge systems
  • Water curtain
  • Neutralization
  • Excess flow valve
  • Flares
  • Scrubbers
  • Emergency shutdown

4. Flammables: Worst-case

None

5. Flammables: Alternative release

None

6. Five-year accident history

No Registered Accidents

7. Prevention: Program level 3

Sulfuric Acid, Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing (32518)
Prevention Program ID:
1000044308
Safety Review Date
May 22, 2014, since latest RMP submission
PHA Update Date
Dec. 12, 2012, since latest RMP submission
PHA Techniques
  • What if/Checklist
Hazards Identified
  • Toxic release
  • Overfilling
  • Equipment failure
  • Hurricanes
Process Controls
  • Relief Valves
  • Scrubbers
  • Manual Shutoffs
  • Automatic Shutoffs
  • Interlocks
  • Alarms
  • Emergency Power
  • Inhibitor Addition
  • Rupture Disks
Mitigation Systems
  • None
Monitoring Systems
  • None
Changes since PHA
  • None
Training Type
  • Classrom
  • On the Job
Competency Testing
  • Written Test
  • Oral Test
  • Demonstration
  • Observation
Procedure Review Date
May 30, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Training Review Date
May 22, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Maintenance Review Date
Dec. 19, 2013, since latest RMP submission
Maintenance Inspection Date
April 23, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Equipment Tested
Yes
Management of Change Most Recent Date
April 30, 2014
Management of Change Review Date
Jan. 15, 2013
Pre-startup Review Date
April 22, 2014
Compliance Audit Date
March 7, 2013
Compliance Audit Change Completion Date
None
Incident Investigation Date
June 3, 2014
Incident Invest. Change Completion Date
June 3, 2014
Participation Plan Review Date
Feb. 28, 2008
Hot Work Review Date
Nov. 19, 2013
Contractor Safety Review Date
June 2, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Contractor Safety Eval. Date
Jan. 20, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Railcar w/o ship papers, Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing (32518)
Prevention Program ID:
1000045932
Safety Review Date
May 22, 2014, since latest RMP submission
PHA Update Date
Dec. 12, 2012, since latest RMP submission
PHA Techniques
  • What if/Checklist
Hazards Identified
  • Toxic release
  • Overfilling
  • Equipment failure
  • Hurricanes
Process Controls
  • Vents
  • Relief Valves
  • Scrubbers
  • Manual Shutoffs
  • Automatic Shutoffs
  • Interlocks
  • Alarms
  • Grounding Equipment
  • Rupture Disks
  • Purge System
Mitigation Systems
  • None
Monitoring Systems
  • None
Changes since PHA
  • None
Training Type
  • Classrom
  • On the Job
Competency Testing
  • Written Test
  • Oral Test
  • Demonstration
  • Observation
Procedure Review Date
May 30, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Training Review Date
May 22, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Maintenance Review Date
Dec. 19, 2013, since latest RMP submission
Maintenance Inspection Date
April 23, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Equipment Tested
Yes
Management of Change Most Recent Date
April 30, 2014
Management of Change Review Date
Jan. 15, 2013
Pre-startup Review Date
April 22, 2014
Compliance Audit Date
March 7, 2013
Compliance Audit Change Completion Date
None
Incident Investigation Date
June 3, 2014
Incident Invest. Change Completion Date
June 3, 2014
Participation Plan Review Date
Feb. 28, 2008
Hot Work Review Date
Nov. 19, 2013
Contractor Safety Review Date
June 2, 2014, since latest RMP submission
Contractor Safety Eval. Date
Jan. 20, 2014, since latest RMP submission

8. Prevention Program level 2

No Prevention Program level 2

9. Emergency response

Facility In Community Plan:
Yes
Facility Own Response Plan:
No
Specific Facility Response Plan:
Yes
Inform. Procedures in Response Plan:
No
Emergency Care in Response Plan:
Yes
Plan Review Date:
Response Training Date:
May 8, 2014
Local Response Agency:
Local Response Agency Phone:
(225) 621-8360
Subject To - OSHA EAP:
No
Subject To - OSHA HAZWOPER:
Yes
Subject To - CWA:
No
Subject To - RCRA:
Yes
Subject To - OPA:
No
Subject To - State EPCRA:
Yes
Subject To - Other:

Executive Summary

17112 LDEQ FACILITY ID NUMBER/ EPA ID 1000 0014 0901



Accidental Release Prevention and Response Policies



DuPont's Burnside Plant has a long-standing commitment to worker and public safety. This commitment is demonstrated by the resources invested in accident prevention, such as training personnel and considering safety in the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of our processes. Our policy is to implement reasonable controls to prevent foreseeable releases of substances. However, if a release does occur, trained personnel will respond to control and contain the release.



Description of the Stationary Source and Regulated Substances



The Burnside Plant manufactures and processes sulfuric acid in Ascension Parish, Louisiana. Raw material, intermediate and process storage tanks are used at the site.



The Burnside Plant was evaluated to determine if any regulated flammable or toxic substances exceeded the threshold quantity. Based on process knowledge, DuPont identified the regulated substances and quantities kept on site. The facility uses two regulated substances, sulfur trioxide and oleum, in the sulfuric acid process (Process 1). In addition,a railcar containing sulfur trioxide may rarely be stored on site for a short time (without active shipping papers - Process 2).



Based on worst-case analyses, the distances to endpoints [i.e. Emergency Response Planning Guideline Level 2 (ERPG-2) developed for each substance by the American Industrial Hygiene Association] exceed the distances to public receptors (i.e., off-site residences, institutions, industrial and commercial office buildings, parks, or recreational areas inhabited or occupied by the public). In addition, DuPont is subject to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Process Safety Management (PSM) and is classified
under a listed SIC Code 2819. Therefore, the sulfuric acid process and railcar storage are classified as Program 3 under the Accidental Release Prevention (ARP) Program.



Off-Site Consequence Analysis Results



Worst-Case Releases



Flammable Substances



The endpoint for the worst-case release of a flammable substance is 1 psi overpressure (i.e. 15.7 psia) for vapor cloud explosions. DuPont Burnside Plant does not store any flammable substances listed in the rule in the threshold quantities required by the regulation; therefore, DuPont does not have a worst-case scenario for flammable substances.



Toxic Substances



Endpoints for toxic substances are based on the ERPG-2. Toxic endpoints are listed in Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 68 (Table of Toxic Endpoints). Each of the regulated toxic substances at the Burnside Plant was reviewed to determine the substance with the greatest distance to an endpoint.



The distance to the toxic endpoint resulting from the instantaneous release of the contents of the oleum tank and a sulfur trioxide railcar with no mitigation, would have an off-site impact, as determined by the U.S. EPA lookup tables contained in the OCA Guidance Document. Railcars are typically shipped out as soon as they are loaded.



Alternative Releases



Alternative release scenarios are those that are more likely to occur than the worst-case release scenario. Alternative release scenarios for toxic substances should be those that lead to concentrations above the endpoint beyond the facility's fenceline. The conditions considered for alternative release scenarios were that the release rate is dependent upon the scenario and active and passive mitigation systems are in place.



Toxic Substances



A hypothetical release scenario has been identified for the regulated toxic substances, oleum and sulfur trioxide in the sulfuric acid process. For sulfur trioxide, it was assumed that a 4-inch pipe would break outside of the containment building where
the sulfur trioxide is stored. This area is not diked, so no mitigation was assumed. This release has an off-site impact, but no impact on residential populations, as determined by the use of the OCA Guidance and the "Landview" program census data.



For oleum, it was assumed that a pipe breaks near the circulation pump. This area is not diked, so no mitigation was assumed. This release also has an off-site impact, but no impact on residential populations, as determined by the use of the OCA Guidance and the "Landview" program census data.



In addition, a hypothetical release scenario has also been identified for the sulfur trioxide stored in a railcar prior to shipping. It was assumed that the railcar leaks and the storage area is not diked, so no active mitigation was in place. Foam would be used to contain and neutralize the spill. This release scenario would not have off-site impact, as determined by the use of the OCA Guidance and the "Landview" program census data.



General Accidental Release Prevention Program



The following is a summary of the accident prevention program in place at DuPont's Burnside Plant. Because processes at the plant that are regulated by the EPA's risk management program (RMP) regulation are also subject to the OSHA's PSM standard, this summary addresses each of the OSHA PSM elements and describes the management system in place to implement the accident prevention program.



Employee Participation



DuPont encourages employees to participate in all facets of process safety management and accident prevention. Examples of employee participation range from updating and compiling technical documents and chemical information to participating as a member of a process hazard analysis (PHA) team. Employees have access to all information created as part of the Burnside Plant's accident prevention program. One way that employees can be involved in the accident prevention program is our Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) Co
mmittee. In addition, Burnside has a number of initiatives under way that address process safety and employee safety issues. These initiatives include forming teams to promote both process and personal safety. The teams have members from all areas of the plant, including operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant management.



Process Safety Information



The Burnside Plant keeps a variety of technical documents that are used to help maintain safe operation of the processes. These documents address chemical properties and associated hazards, limits for key process parameters and specific chemical inventories, and equipment design basis/configuration information. Specific departments within the plant are assigned responsibility for maintaining up-to-date process safety information.



Chemical-specific information, including exposure hazards and emergency response/ exposure treatment considerations, is provided in safety data sheets (SDSs). This information is supplemented by documents that specifically address known corrosion concerns and any known hazards associated with the inadvertent mixing of chemicals. For the sulfuric acid process area, Burnside has documented safety-related limits for specific process parameters (e.g., temperature level, composition) in a Standard Operating Conditions Manual. The plant ensures that the process is maintained within these limits using state-of-the-art process controls and monitoring instruments, emergency relief systems, redundant power supply and safety systems, highly trained personnel, and protective instrument systems (e.g., automated shutdown systems).



The plant also maintains numerous technical documents that provide information about the design and construction of process equipment. This information includes materials of construction, design pressure and temperature ratings, and electrical rating of equipment. This information, in combination with written procedures and trained personnel, provides a b
asis for establishing inspection and maintenance activities, as well as for evaluating proposed process and facility changes to ensure that safety features in the process are not compromised.



Process Hazard Analysis (PHA)



Burnside has a comprehensive program to help ensure that hazards associated with the various processes are identified and controlled. Within this program, each process is systematically examined to identify hazards and ensure the adequate controls are in place to manage these hazards.



Burnside primarily uses the hazard and operability What if technique to perform thes evaluations. What if analysis is recognized as one of the most systematic and thorough hazard evaluation techniques. These What If Checklists are used by team members with operating and maintenance experience as well as engineering experience. The Team evaluates hazards of the process as well as accident prevention and mitigation measures, and makes suggestions for additional prevention and/or mitigation measures when the team believes such measures are necessary.



The PHA team findings are forwarded to local and corporate management for resolution. Implementation of mitigation options in response to PHA findings is based on a relative risk ranking assigned by the PHA team. This ranking helps ensure that potential accident scenarios assigned the highest risk receive immediate attention. All approved mitigation options in response to PHA team findings are tracked until they are completed. The final resolution of each finding is documented and retained.

To help ensure that the process controls and/or process hazards do not eventually deviate significantly from the original design safety features, Burnside periodically updates and revalidates the hazard analysis results. These periodic reviews are conducted every 5 years and will be conducted at this frequency until the process is no longer operating. The results and findings from these updates are documented and r
etained. Once again, the team findings are forwarded to management for final approval, and the final resolution of the findings is documented and retained.



Operating Procedures



Burnside maintains written procedures that address various modes of process operations, such as (1) unit startup, (2) normal operations, (3) temporary operations, (4) emergency shutdown, (5) normal shutdown, and (6) initial startup of a new process. These procedures can be used as a reference by experienced operators and provide a basis for consistent training of new operators. These procedures are periodically reviewed and annually certified as current and accurate. The procedures are kept current and accurate by revising them as necessary to reflect changes made through the management of change process.

This information is readily available to operators in the process unit and for other personnel to use as necessary to safely perform their job tasks.



Training



To complement the written procedures for process operations, Burnside has implemented a comprehensive training program for all employees involved in operating a process. New employees receive basic training in plant operations if they are not already familiar with such operations. After successfully completing this training, a new operator is paired with a senior operator to learn process-specific duties and tasks. After operators demonstrate (e.g., through tests, skills demonstration) having adequate knowledge to perform the duties and tasks in a safe manner on their own, they can work independently. In addition, all operators periodically receive refresher training on the operating procedures to ensure that their skills and knowledge are maintained at an acceptable level. This refresher training is conducted at least every 3 years. All of this training is documented for each operator, including the means used to verify that the operator understood the training.



Contractors



Burnside uses contractors to sup
plement its workforce. Because some contractors work on or near process equipment, the plant has procedures in place to ensure that contractors (1) perform their work in a safe manner, (2) have the appropriate knowledge and skills, (3) are aware of the hazards in their workplace, (4) understand what they should do in the event of an emergency, (5) understand and follow site safety rules, and (6) inform plant personnel of any hazards that they find during their work. This is accomplished by providing contractors with (1) a process overview, (2) information about safety and health hazards, (3) emergency response plan requirements, and (4) safe work practices prior to their beginning work. In addition, Burnside evaluates contractor safety programs and performance during the selection of a contractor. Plant personnel periodically monitor contractor performance to ensure that contractors are fulfilling their safety obligations.



Pre-startup Safety Reviews (PSSRs)



Burnside conducts a PSSR for any facility modification that requires a change in the process safety information. The purpose of the PSSR is to ensure that safety features, procedures, personnel, and equipment are appropriately prepared for startup prior to placing the equipment into service. This review provides one additional check to make sure construction is in accordance with the design specifications and that all supporting systems are operationally ready. The PSSR review team uses checklists to verify all aspects of readiness. A PSSR involves field verification of the construction and serves a quality assurance function by requiring verification that accident prevention program requirements are properly implemented.



Mechanical Integrity



Burnside has well-established practices and procedures to maintain pressure vessels, piping systems, relief and vent systems, controls, pumps,compressors, and emergency shutdown systems in a safe operating condition. The basic aspects of this program inc
lude: (1) conducting training, (2) developing written procedures, (3) performing inspections and tests, (4) correcting identified deficiencies, and (5) applying quality assurance measures. In combination, these activities form a system that maintains the mechanical integrity of the process.



Maintenance personnel receive training on (1) an overview of the process, (2) safety and health hazards, (3) applicable maintenance procedures, (4) emergency response plans, and (5) applicable safe work practices to help ensure that they can perform their jobs in a safe manner. Written procedures help ensure that work is performed in a consistent manner and provide a basis for training. Inspections and tests are performed to help ensure that equipment functions as intended and to verify that equipment is within acceptable limits (e.g., adequate wall thickness for pressure vessels). If a deficiency is identified, employees will correct the deficiency before placing the equipment back into service (if possible), or a management of change team will review the use of the equipment and determine what actions are necessary to ensure the safe operation of the equipment.



Another integral part of the mechanical integrity program is quality assurance. Burnside incorporates quality assurance measures into equipment purchases and repairs. This helps ensure that new equipment is suitable for its intended use and that proper materials and spare parts are used when repairs are made.



Safe Work Practices



Burnside has long-standing safe work practices in place to help ensure worker and process safety. Examples of these include (1) control of the entry/presence/exit of support personnel, (2) a lockout/tagout procedure to ensure isolation of energy sources for equipment undergoing maintenance, (3) a procedure for safe removal of hazardous substances before process piping or equipment is opened, (4) a permit and procedure to control spark-producing activities (i.e., hot work), (5) a
permit and procedure to ensure that adequate precautions are in place before entry into a confined space, and (6) a pre-start-up safety review on each unit. These procedures (and others), along with training of affected personnel, form a system to help ensure that operations and maintenance activities are performed safely.



Management of Change



Burnside has a comprehensive system to manage changes to all covered processes. This system requires that changes to items such as process equipment, chemicals, technology (including process operating conditions), procedures, and other facility changes be properly reviewed and authorized before being implemented. Changes are reviewed to (1) ensure that adequate controls are in place to manage any new hazards and (2) verify that existing controls have not been compromised by the change. Affected chemical hazard information, process operating limits, and equipment information, as well as procedures, are updated to incorporate these changes. In addition, operating and maintenance personnel are provided any necessary training on the change.



Incident Investigation



Burnside will promptly investigate all incidents that result in, or reasonably could have resulted in, a fire/explosion, toxic gas release, major property damage, environmental loss, or personal injury. The goal of each investigation is to determine the facts and develop corrective actions to prevent a recurrence of the incident or a similar incident. The investigation team documents its findings, develops recommendations to prevent a recurrence, and forwards these results to plant management for resolution. Corrective actions taken in response to the investigation team's findings and recommendations are tracked until they are complete. The final resolution of each finding or recommendation is documented, and the investigation results are reviewed with all employees (including contractors) who could be affected by the findings. Incident investigation
reports are retained for at least 5 years so that the reports can be reviewed during future PHAs and PHA revalidations.



Compliance Audits



To help ensure that the accident prevention program is functioning properly, Burnside periodically conducts audits to determine whether the procedures and practices required by the accident prevention program are being implemented. Compliance audits are conducted at least every 3 years. Both hourly and staff personnel participate as audit team members. The audit team develops findings that are forwarded to plant management for resolution. Corrective actions taken in response to the audit team's findings are tracked until they are complete. The final resolution of each finding is documented, and the two most recent audit reports are retained.



Chemical-Specific Prevention Steps



The process at Burnside has hazards that must be managed to ensure continued safe operation. The following is a description of existing safety features applicable to prevention of accidental releases of regulated substances in the facility.



Universal Prevention Activities



The accident prevention program summarized previously is applied to all RMP-covered processes at Burnside. Collectively, these prevention program activities help prevent potential accident scenarios that could be caused by equipment failures and human errors.



Specialized Safety Features



Burnside has safety features on units to help (1) contain/control a release, (2) quickly detect a release, and (3) reduce the consequences of (mitigate) a release. The following types of safety features are used in the covered process:

A? Release Containment/Control

A? Automatic shut-off devices and relief valves

A? Curbing or diking to contain liquid releases

A? Redundant equipment and instrumentation (e.g., uninterruptible power supply for process control system)

A? Administrative controls to minimize toxic chemical inventories.

A? Release Mitigation

A? Trained emergency
response personnel

A? Personal protective equipment (e.g., chemical protective clothing, self-contained breathing apparatus)

A? Continuous pressure monitoring of vessels and pipes

A? Audible warning alarms



Five-Year Accident History



DuPont Burnside Plant has not had any accidental releases during the past five years which meet the criteria for an accidental release per 40 CFR 68.42.



Emergency Response Program Information



Burnside maintains a written incident response plan, which is in place to protect worker and public safety as well as the environment during an emergency. The plan consists of procedures for responding to a release of a regulated substance. The procedures address all aspects of emergency response, including proper first aid and medical treatment for exposures, evacuation plans and accounting for personnel after an evacuation, notification of local emergency response agencies and the public if a release occurs, and post-incident cleanup and decontamination requirements. In addition, the plant has procedures that address maintenance, inspection, and testing of emergency response equipment, as well as instructions that address the use of emergency response equipment. Employees receive training in these procedures as necessary to perform their specific emergency response duties. The incident response plan is updated when necessary based on modifications made to plant processes.



The overall emergency response program for Burnside is coordinated with the Gonzales Fire Department, Ascension Parish LEPC and St. James Parish LEPC. Coordination includes periodic meeting of Burnside personnel with the LEPCs and the Fire Chief to discuss needs and concerns in the event of an incident. Burnside has around-the-clock communications capability with the Ascension Parish LEPC and the St. James Parish LEPC, who have the ability to communicate to all state, federal and county agencies as to needed equipment (i.e., firefighting equipment, manpo
wer, ambulances, hospitals, law enforcement, and HAZMAT operations). This provides a means of notifying the public of an incident, if necessary, as well as facilitating quick response to an incident. In addition to periodic meetings with the Fire Chief and the area LEPCs, Burnside conducts periodic emergency drills that involve the Ascension Parish LEPC, the St. James Parish LEPC, Fire Department, and emergency response organizations. In addition, the plant communicates the hazards of regulated substances in the plant annually to to local emergency respondersPlanned Changes to Improve Safety.



Burnside has several elements of the management system of the accident prevention program in place to improve safety throughout the facility. These elements are part of an overall ongoing safety improvement process. The Process Hazard Analysis, Management of Change, and Compliance Audits are all elements of the management system are present to improve safety.